linux-kernel - Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a9348f4-d059-de28-1445-0189b7fb0ba3@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:17:00 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc:     Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

>> Which test results would you like to see or hear (!) from a real device
>> (or a configuration in a virtual machine)?
> 
> I don't mind either case as long as the test works.

How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked
in reasonable ways?


>> I find such a development tool very relevant to reduce your concerns.
> 
> It's about your patches, not my system.

Your own automatic test system could provide a bit of
more confidence for some change possibilities, couldn't it?

Regards,
Markus