linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/21] afs: Fix const confusion in AFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <11150.1511885078@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:04:38 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        samitolvanen@...gle.com, alxmtvv@...il.com,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/21] afs: Fix const confusion in AFS

Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:

> A trace point string cannot be const because the underlying special
> section is not marked const. An LTO build complains about the
> section attribute mismatch. Fix it by not marking the trace point
> string in afs const.

Do you want this to go through my tree?

David