[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171128114822.0f80ed1e@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:48:22 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Vladislav Valtchev (VMware)" <vladislav.valtchev@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, y.karadz@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] trace-cmd: Extract parse_record_options() from
trace_record()
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:33:28 +0200
"Vladislav Valtchev (VMware)" <vladislav.valtchev@...il.com> wrote:
> In this patch a huge part of trace_record(), dealing with parsing the command
> line options, has been extracted in a separate function. That allows the body
> of trace_record() to be focused only on the proper actions involved in a given
> type of tracing (record, stream, etc.) reducing, this way, the scope and the
> complexity of trace_record().
Hi Vladislav,
I applied patches 1-3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Valtchev (VMware) <vladislav.valtchev@...il.com>
> ---
> +
> +static void parse_record_options(int argc,
> + char **argv,
> + struct common_record_context *ctx)
> {
> const char *plugin = NULL;
> - const char *output = NULL;
> const char *option;
> struct event_list *event = NULL;
> struct event_list *last_event = NULL;
> - struct buffer_instance *instance = &top_instance;
> - enum trace_type type = 0;
> char *pids;
> char *pid;
> char *sav;
> - char *date2ts = NULL;
> - int record_all = 0;
> - int total_disable = 0;
> - int disable = 0;
> - int events = 0;
> - int record = 0;
> - int extract = 0;
> - int stream = 0;
> - int profile = 0;
> - int global = 0;
> - int start = 0;
> - int filtered = 0;
> - int run_command = 0;
> int neg_event = 0;
> - int date = 0;
> - int manual = 0;
> - char *max_graph_depth = NULL;
> - int topt = 0;
> - int do_child = 0;
> - int data_flags = 0;
> -
> - int c;
> -
> - init_instance(instance);
> -
> - cpu_count = count_cpus();
> -
> - if ((record = (strcmp(argv[1], "record") == 0)))
> - ; /* do nothing */
> - else if ((start = strcmp(argv[1], "start") == 0))
> - ; /* do nothing */
> - else if ((extract = strcmp(argv[1], "extract") == 0))
> - ; /* do nothing */
> - else if ((stream = strcmp(argv[1], "stream") == 0))
> - ; /* do nothing */
> - else if ((profile = strcmp(argv[1], "profile") == 0)) {
> - handle_init = trace_init_profile;
> - events = 1;
> - } else
> - usage(argv);
>
> for (;;) {
> int option_index = 0;
> int ret;
> + int c;
> const char *opts;
> static struct option long_options[] = {
> {"date", no_argument, NULL, OPT_date},
> @@ -4431,7 +4419,7 @@ void trace_record(int argc, char **argv)
>
+
> +static void init_common_record_context(struct common_record_context *ctx)
> +{
> + memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
> + ctx->instance = &top_instance;
> + cpu_count = count_cpus();
> +}
> +
> +void trace_record(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + struct common_record_context ctx;
> + enum trace_type type = 0;
> +
> + init_common_record_context(&ctx);
> + init_instance(ctx.instance);
Is there a reason that init_instance() isn't called in
init_common_record_context()?
Also, why not just do the "init_common_record_context()" in
parse_record_options()?
-- Steve
> +
> + if ((ctx.record = (strcmp(argv[1], "record") == 0)))
> + ; /* do nothing */
> + else if ((ctx.start = strcmp(argv[1], "start") == 0))
> + ; /* do nothing */
> + else if ((ctx.extract = strcmp(argv[1], "extract") == 0))
> + ; /* do nothing */
> + else if ((ctx.stream = strcmp(argv[1], "stream") == 0))
> + ; /* do nothing */
> + else if ((ctx.profile = strcmp(argv[1], "profile") == 0)) {
> + handle_init = trace_init_profile;
> + ctx.events = 1;
> + } else
> + usage(argv);
> +
> +
> + parse_record_options(argc, argv, &ctx);
> +
> +
> /*
> * If this is a profile run, and no instances were set,
> * then enable profiling on the top instance.
> */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists