linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 28 (arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711281807300.2222@nanos>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:08:28 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 28 (arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c)

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> On 11/27/2017 07:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20171127:
> > 
> > New trees:	ntb, kvm-master, at24
> > 
> 
> 
> on x86_64:
> 
> ../arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c: In function 'kaiser_shadow_pagetable_walk':
> ../arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c:173:28: error: '__GFP_NOTRACK' undeclared (first use in this function)
>   gfp_t gfp = (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_ZERO);

Yes, we need to remove that before merging it into next. The branch is
still based on something which has notrack for various reasons.

Thanks,

	tglx