[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99282c06-bfad-d7cf-16d8-eb1e015ebdbd@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:15:34 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
>> Do you want that I point any other patch out which you could find
>> easier to handle again?
>
> Only if they got tested and/or got reviewed by others.
Would you find any of the following update suggestions trivial enough
to integrate them?
Examples:
* ALSA: cs5530: Use common error handling code in snd_cs5530_probe()
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/18/266
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10064945/
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<a2cb6494-a01c-668a-cd9b-1a8428a0d4c9@...rs.sourceforge.net>
* ASoC: dapm: Use kcalloc() in snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets()
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/10/425
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9893713/
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<62be9e32-1b8d-3980-7998-72f82c62a6fe@...rs.sourceforge.net>
* ALSA: seq: Delete unnecessary checks in snd_seq_ioctl_query_subs()
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/24/293
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9534795/
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<39bc00c0-ffe7-851c-f329-e7d499f561be@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists