[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1511890919.19952.42.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:41:59 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <wilal.deacon@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>,
Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] add printk specifier %px, unique identifier
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:33 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh well, I just did /proc/<pid>/stack by making it just print 0
> > > unconditionally rather than the hex number.
> >
> > Patch?
>
> Oh, apparently I never pushed out yesterday.
>
> The patch literally just affects the (useless) hex number. So:
>
> cat /proc/self/stack
>
> now prints out
>
> [<0>] proc_pid_stack+0xaa/0x100
> [<0>] proc_single_show+0x48/0x80
> [<0>] seq_read+0xd2/0x410
> I considered getting rid of the whole "[<>]" thing, but that's where
> "maybe there are tools that parse this" came in.
>
> I doubt there are any, though. If proc-ps doesn't look at this, I
> don't know what could. But the format change might as well be a
> separate thing if somebody cares deeply.
Perhaps if there are really tools that parse this
the [<leading-0-width>] should be kept the same too.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists