[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171128204353.imy2rd6fy7hzrvzg@flea.home>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:43:53 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>, wens@...e.org,
airlied@...ux.ie, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/17] drm/sun4i: Add CCSC property to DE2 configuration
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2017-11-28 04:57,Jernej Skrabec 写道:
> > Base addresses of channel output CSC (CCSC) depends whether mixer in
> > question is first or second and if it is second, if supports VEP or not.
> > This new property will tell which set of base addresses to take.
> >
> > 0 - first mixer or second mixer with VEP support
> > 1 - second mixer without VEP support
>
> Maxime,
>
> I think here the ID of the mixer matters.
>
> P.S. I didn't found any SoC with a second mixer with VEP currently
Then we'll have an allwinner,has-vep; property (or whatever) for all
those SoCs' mixer0. What's the big deal about it?
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists