linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 11/11] intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171128204616.aqll77bnyhg3eov7@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:46:16 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/11] intel_sgx: driver documentation

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:37:48PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:03:39AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > I have a branch based on Jarkko's patches (I believe it's up-to-date with v5)
> > that implements what I described.  I'd be happy to send RFC patches if that
> > would help.
> 
> That would only slow things down. The code is easy to move around and
> I'm doing infrastructure changes as part of the review process. The
> latest version (v6) that I sent on Sat has struct sgx_epc_page removed
> just to name an example.
> 
> Rather than sending any deprecated patches it would be more useful to
> get input (in English) on directory layout.
> 
> I guess you missed v6 as it I had to drop the 01.org list temporarily.
> It will be back in v7 as I was able to retrieve the admin password and
> configure it in suitable way.

Once my series has been landed, you could drop a series for review. Then
it does make sense. I won't of course add any exports needed by KVM etc.
I'm only doing "lowest common denominator" groundwork.

/Jarkko