linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] RDMA/hns: Bug fixes in hns RoCE driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:15:17 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>, dledford@...hat.com,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        xavier.huwei@....com, xavier_huwei@....com, linuxarm@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RDMA/hns: Bug fixes in hns RoCE driver

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:36:37AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:41:21AM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
> > This patch-set introduces three patches to fix about the memory
> > related issues.
>
> If these patches are for-rc can you revise the commit message to more
> clearly explain what the bug is, and supply Fixes lines?
>
> Otherwise these will go to 4.16

Jason,

If you treat all unmarked patches (without mentioning in cover letter or
subject title) as targeted to for-next, it will make your life much more
easier than trying to pick each patch alone. As an outcome, it will make
the patch flow more predictable for us.

Thanks

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)