[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1511856244.19952.14.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:04:04 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>,
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory
allocation in three functions
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 08:41 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests
> > > according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for.
> >
> > That's because you are pretty unresponsive to direction.
>
> From which places did you get this impression?
How many times have I told you to include the reason for
your patches in
your proposed commit message? Too often.
For instance, specific to this patch:
Many people do not know that a generic kmalloc does a
dump_stack() on OOM. That information should be part
of the commit message.
Also removing the printk code reduces overall code size.
The actual size reduction should be described in the
commit message too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists