[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171128100508.877491398@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:23:39 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 90/96] netfilter: nft_queue: use raw_smp_processor_id()
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
[ Upstream commit c2e756ff9e699865d294cdc112acfc36419cf5cc ]
Using smp_processor_id() causes splats with PREEMPT_RCU:
[19379.552780] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: ping/32389
[19379.552793] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
[...]
[19379.552823] Call Trace:
[19379.552832] [<ffffffff81274e9e>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[19379.552837] [<ffffffff8129a4d4>] check_preemption_disabled+0xe5/0xf5
[19379.552842] [<ffffffff8129a4fb>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
[19379.552849] [<ffffffffa07c42dd>] nft_queue_eval+0x35/0x20c [nft_queue]
No need to disable preemption since we only fetch the numeric value, so
let's use raw_smp_processor_id() instead.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/nft_queue.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_queue.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_queue.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static void nft_queue_eval(const struct
if (priv->queues_total > 1) {
if (priv->flags & NFT_QUEUE_FLAG_CPU_FANOUT) {
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
queue = priv->queuenum + cpu % priv->queues_total;
} else {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists