lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 11:39:32 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Luca Miccio <lucmiccio@...il.com>, bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block, bfq: remove batches of confusing ifdefs

On 28 November 2017 at 10:37, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org> wrote:
> Commit a33801e8b473 ("block, bfq: move debug blkio stats behind
> CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP") introduced two batches of confusing ifdefs:
> one reported in [1], plus a similar one in another function. This
> commit removes both batches, in the way suggested in [1].
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg20043.html
>
> Fixes: a33801e8b473 ("block, bfq: move debug blkio stats behind CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP")
> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Tested-by: Luca Miccio <lucmiccio@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>

This is a good step of improvement (one may consider more steps...),
so feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
>  block/bfq-iosched.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index bcb6d21..0153fea 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -3689,35 +3689,16 @@ static struct request *__bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>         return rq;
>  }
>
> -static struct request *bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> -{
> -       struct bfq_data *bfqd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;
> -       struct request *rq;
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP)
> -       struct bfq_queue *in_serv_queue, *bfqq;
> -       bool waiting_rq, idle_timer_disabled;
> -#endif
> -
> -       spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
> -
>  #if defined(CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP)
> -       in_serv_queue = bfqd->in_service_queue;
> -       waiting_rq = in_serv_queue && bfq_bfqq_wait_request(in_serv_queue);
> -
> -       rq = __bfq_dispatch_request(hctx);
> -
> -       idle_timer_disabled =
> -               waiting_rq && !bfq_bfqq_wait_request(in_serv_queue);
> -
> -#else
> -       rq = __bfq_dispatch_request(hctx);
> -#endif
> -       spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
> +static inline void bfq_update_dispatch_stats(struct request *rq,
> +                                            spinlock_t *queue_lock,
> +                                            struct bfq_queue *in_serv_queue,
> +                                            bool idle_timer_disabled)
> +{
> +       struct bfq_queue *bfqq = rq ? RQ_BFQQ(rq) : NULL;
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP)
> -       bfqq = rq ? RQ_BFQQ(rq) : NULL;
>         if (!idle_timer_disabled && !bfqq)
> -               return rq;
> +               return;
>
>         /*
>          * rq and bfqq are guaranteed to exist until this function
> @@ -3732,7 +3713,7 @@ static struct request *bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>          * In addition, the following queue lock guarantees that
>          * bfqq_group(bfqq) exists as well.
>          */
> -       spin_lock_irq(hctx->queue->queue_lock);
> +       spin_lock_irq(queue_lock);
>         if (idle_timer_disabled)
>                 /*
>                  * Since the idle timer has been disabled,
> @@ -3751,9 +3732,37 @@ static struct request *bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>                 bfqg_stats_set_start_empty_time(bfqg);
>                 bfqg_stats_update_io_remove(bfqg, rq->cmd_flags);
>         }
> -       spin_unlock_irq(hctx->queue->queue_lock);
> +       spin_unlock_irq(queue_lock);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void bfq_update_dispatch_stats(struct request *rq,
> +                                            spinlock_t *queue_lock,
> +                                            struct bfq_queue *in_serv_queue,
> +                                            bool idle_timer_disabled) {}
>  #endif
>
> +static struct request *bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +{
> +       struct bfq_data *bfqd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;
> +       struct request *rq;
> +       struct bfq_queue *in_serv_queue;
> +       bool waiting_rq, idle_timer_disabled;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
> +
> +       in_serv_queue = bfqd->in_service_queue;
> +       waiting_rq = in_serv_queue && bfq_bfqq_wait_request(in_serv_queue);
> +
> +       rq = __bfq_dispatch_request(hctx);
> +
> +       idle_timer_disabled =
> +               waiting_rq && !bfq_bfqq_wait_request(in_serv_queue);
> +
> +       spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
> +
> +       bfq_update_dispatch_stats(rq, hctx->queue->queue_lock, in_serv_queue,
> +                                 idle_timer_disabled);
> +
>         return rq;
>  }
>
> @@ -4276,16 +4285,46 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq)
>         return idle_timer_disabled;
>  }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP)
> +static inline void bfq_update_insert_stats(struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
> +                                          spinlock_t *queue_lock,
> +                                          bool idle_timer_disabled,
> +                                          unsigned int cmd_flags)
> +{
> +       if (!bfqq)
> +               return;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * bfqq still exists, because it can disappear only after
> +        * either it is merged with another queue, or the process it
> +        * is associated with exits. But both actions must be taken by
> +        * the same process currently executing this flow of
> +        * instructions.
> +        *
> +        * In addition, the following queue lock guarantees that
> +        * bfqq_group(bfqq) exists as well.
> +        */
> +       spin_lock_irq(queue_lock);
> +       bfqg_stats_update_io_add(bfqq_group(bfqq), bfqq, cmd_flags);
> +       if (idle_timer_disabled)
> +               bfqg_stats_update_idle_time(bfqq_group(bfqq));
> +       spin_unlock_irq(queue_lock);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void bfq_update_insert_stats(struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
> +                                          spinlock_t *queue_lock,
> +                                          bool idle_timer_disabled,
> +                                          unsigned int cmd_flags) {}
> +#endif
> +
>  static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
>                                bool at_head)
>  {
>         struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
>         struct bfq_data *bfqd = q->elevator->elevator_data;
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP)
>         struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(rq);
>         bool idle_timer_disabled = false;
>         unsigned int cmd_flags;
> -#endif
>
>         spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
>         if (blk_mq_sched_try_insert_merge(q, rq)) {
> @@ -4304,7 +4343,6 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
>                 else
>                         list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &bfqd->dispatch);
>         } else {
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP)
>                 idle_timer_disabled = __bfq_insert_request(bfqd, rq);
>                 /*
>                  * Update bfqq, because, if a queue merge has occurred
> @@ -4312,9 +4350,6 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
>                  * redirected into a new queue.
>                  */
>                 bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(rq);
> -#else
> -               __bfq_insert_request(bfqd, rq);
> -#endif
>
>                 if (rq_mergeable(rq)) {
>                         elv_rqhash_add(q, rq);
> @@ -4323,35 +4358,17 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
>                 }
>         }
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP)
>         /*
>          * Cache cmd_flags before releasing scheduler lock, because rq
>          * may disappear afterwards (for example, because of a request
>          * merge).
>          */
>         cmd_flags = rq->cmd_flags;
> -#endif
> +
>         spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED) && defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP)
> -       if (!bfqq)
> -               return;
> -       /*
> -        * bfqq still exists, because it can disappear only after
> -        * either it is merged with another queue, or the process it
> -        * is associated with exits. But both actions must be taken by
> -        * the same process currently executing this flow of
> -        * instruction.
> -        *
> -        * In addition, the following queue lock guarantees that
> -        * bfqq_group(bfqq) exists as well.
> -        */
> -       spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> -       bfqg_stats_update_io_add(bfqq_group(bfqq), bfqq, cmd_flags);
> -       if (idle_timer_disabled)
> -               bfqg_stats_update_idle_time(bfqq_group(bfqq));
> -       spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> -#endif
> +       bfq_update_insert_stats(bfqq, q->queue_lock, idle_timer_disabled,
> +                               cmd_flags);
>  }
>
>  static void bfq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> --
> 2.10.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ