linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] perf util: Add rbtree node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171128111228.GC2732@krava>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:12:28 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] perf util: Add rbtree node_delete ops

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:07:24PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> In current stat-shadow.c, the rbtree deleting is ignored.
> 
> The patch reconstructs the code of rblist init/free, and adds
> the implementation to node_delete method of rblist.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  tools/perf/util/stat.h        |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> index c53b80d..0fdd2aa 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static struct stats runtime_aperf_stats[NUM_CTX][MAX_NR_CPUS];
>  static struct rblist runtime_saved_values;
>  static bool have_frontend_stalled;
>  
> +struct runtime_stat rt_stat;
>  struct stats walltime_nsecs_stats;
>  
>  struct saved_value {
> @@ -103,6 +104,18 @@ static struct rb_node *saved_value_new(struct rblist *rblist __maybe_unused,
>  	return &nd->rb_node;
>  }
>  
> +static void saved_value_delete(struct rblist *rblist __maybe_unused,
> +			       struct rb_node *rb_node)
> +{
> +	struct saved_value *v;
> +
> +	BUG_ON(!rb_node);
> +	v = container_of(rb_node,
> +			 struct saved_value,
> +			 rb_node);

any reason for this to be cut on 3 lines? single line wouldn't cross 80 chars length..

jirka