linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/12] perf, tools, probe: Support a quiet argument for debug info open

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171129033943.GA2482@two.firstfloor.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:39:43 -0800
From:   Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, acme@...nel.org,
        jolsa@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] perf, tools, probe: Support a quiet argument for
 debug info open

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:14:00PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:23:15 -0800
> Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Add a extra quiet argument to the debug info open / probe finder
> > code that allows perf script to make them quieter. Otherwise
> > we may end up with too many error messages when lots of
> > instructions fail debug info parsing.
> 
> IMHO, this kind of simple suppress warning message would better
> be done with pr_* implementation (or its macro) since there
> maybe new message added or other function which has warning
> messages can be called in the future.

Do you really mean adding a special pr_ / global just for this case?

Seems less clean to me, but I can do it.

-Andi