[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <793b9c55-e85b-97b5-c857-dd8edcda4081@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:01:35 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] x86: 5-level related changes into decompression
code
On 11/29/17 09:48, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:08:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> We're really early in the boot -- startup_64 in decompression code -- and
>> I don't know a way print a message there. Is there a way?
>>
>> no_longmode handled by just hanging the machine. Is it enough for no_la57
>> case too?
>
> Patch pls.
>
I don't think there is any way to get a message out here. It's too late
to use the firmware, and too early to use anything native.
no_longmode in startup_64 is an oxymoron -- it simply can't happen,
although of course we can enter at the 32-bit entry point with that problem.
We can hang the machine, or we can triple-fault it in the hope of
triggering a reset, and that way if the bootloader has been configured
with a backup kernel there is a hope of recovery.
Triple-faulting is trivial:
push $0
push $0
lidt (%rsp) /* %esp for 32-bit mode */
ud2
/* WTF? */
1: hlt
jmp 1b
This will either hang the machine or reboot it, depending on if the
reboot-on-triple-fault logic in the chipset actually works.
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists