lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:33:23 +0100
From:   Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
To:     Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        arndbergmann@...il.com,
        Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Use DEFINE_RES_MEM macros
 where applicable

Hi!

On 21/11/17 15:31, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> This commit cleans up the code by using dedicated macros instead of
> full definitions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>

Acked-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>

> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - None
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c | 18 +++---------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c
> index 8745162ec05d..06345b85f27c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c
> @@ -187,16 +187,8 @@ static struct platform_device ts72xx_rtc_device = {
>  };
>  
>  static struct resource ts72xx_wdt_resources[] = {
> -	{
> -		.start	= TS72XX_WDT_CONTROL_PHYS_BASE,
> -		.end	= TS72XX_WDT_CONTROL_PHYS_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
> -		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -	},
> -	{
> -		.start	= TS72XX_WDT_FEED_PHYS_BASE,
> -		.end	= TS72XX_WDT_FEED_PHYS_BASE + SZ_4K - 1,
> -		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -	},
> +	DEFINE_RES_MEM(TS72XX_WDT_CONTROL_PHYS_BASE, SZ_4K),
> +	DEFINE_RES_MEM(TS72XX_WDT_FEED_PHYS_BASE, SZ_4K),
>  };
>  
>  static struct platform_device ts72xx_wdt_device = {
> @@ -216,11 +208,7 @@ static struct ep93xx_eth_data __initdata ts72xx_eth_data = {
>  #define TS73XX_FPGA_LOADER_BASE		0x03c00000
>  
>  static struct resource ts73xx_fpga_resources[] = {
> -	{
> -		.start	= EP93XX_CS1_PHYS_BASE + TS73XX_FPGA_LOADER_BASE,
> -		.end	= EP93XX_CS1_PHYS_BASE + TS73XX_FPGA_LOADER_BASE + 1,
> -		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> -	},
> +	DEFINE_RES_MEM(EP93XX_CS1_PHYS_BASE + TS73XX_FPGA_LOADER_BASE, 0x01),
>  };
>  
>  static struct platform_device ts73xx_fpga_device = {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists