[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171129205442.GJ3624@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:54:42 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lihao Liang <lianglihao@...wei.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lihao.liang@...il.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:29:03AM +0800, Lihao Liang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017/11/29 11:14, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > Hi Lihao,
> >
> > On 2017/11/29 10:48, Lihao Liang wrote:
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lihao Liang <lihao.liang@...il.com>
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >> Lihao.
> >>
> >> On 2017/11/29 9:14, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:51:51AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>> Hi Paul,
> >>>>
> >>>> Commit
> >>>>
> >>>> d7e182c9c324 ("rcu: Remove unnecessary spinlock in rcu_boot_init_percpu_data()")
> >>>>
> >>>> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> >>> Good catch, Stephen!
> >>>
> >>> Lihao, would you please get me you Signed-off-by? The patch is below.
> >>>
> >>> Thanx, Paul
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> commit d7e182c9c32480c1f579dd888ac50e88bfb39596
> >>> Author: Liang Lihao <lianglihao@...wei.com>
> >
> > So it's better to keep the author and Signed-off-by the same :)
> >
>
> Sure. Paul and Stephen, please use
>
> Signed-off-by: Lihao Liang <lianglihao@...wei.com>
Updated, thank you both!
Thanx, Paul
> Many thanks,
> Lihao.
>
> > Thanks
> > Hanjun
> >
> >
> > .
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists