[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd656bd9-2e70-931b-62d7-f2c5b68d1892@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:14:35 -0500
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, robin.murphy@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/4] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: add support for the new
revision
+linux-acpi
On 11/29/2017 8:58 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> + cap = (enum hidma_cap) acpi_device_get_match_data(dev);
> should this not reside in core? How about a device_get_match_data() which
> returns the data for folks based on node being acpi/of
Sure,
I'm preparing a device function to read this as you suggested.
Sinan
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists