linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: inject exceptions produced by x86_decode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171129231047.GD3037@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:10:47 -0200
From:   Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, yfu@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: inject exceptions produced by x86_decode_insn

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:47:14PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 29/11/2017 19:42, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > The reproducer (not a full test case) is quite simple, see patch below.
> 
> Great, thanks.  I assume that the patch doesn't fix it?!?

I was so convinced that it was impossible for the patch to fix
the problem, that I forgot to test it.  :)

I will test it tomorrow and let you know.


> 
> Paolo
> 
> > Now, I've noticed something interesting when running the
> > reproducer:
> > 
> > If the test_fetch_failure() call happens before we touch
> > pci-testdev through *mem (like in the patch below), we get an
> > emulation failure like the one Yanan saw:
> > 
> >   $ /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -device pc-testdev -device isa-debug-exit,iobase=0xf4,iosize=0x4 -vnc none -serial stdio -device pci-testdev -machine accel=kvm -kernel ./x86/emulator.flat # -initrd /tmp/tmp.RCPjppRp8i
> >   enabling apic
> >   paging enabled
> >   cr0 = 80010011
> >   cr3 = 45e000
> >   cr4 = 20
> >   KVM internal error. Suberror: 1
> >   emulation failure
> >   RAX=0000000000000000 RBX=0000000000000000 RCX=0000000000000000 RDX=0000000000000000
> >   RSI=0000000000000000 RDI=0000000000000000 RBP=0000000000000000 RSP=0000000000000000
> >   R8 =0000000000000000 R9 =0000000000000000 R10=0000000000000000 R11=0000000000000000
> >   R12=0000000000000000 R13=0000000000000000 R14=0000000000000000 R15=0000000000000000
> >   RIP=ffffffffffffc08a RFL=00010002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
> >   ES =0010 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS   [-WA]
> >   CS =0008 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00a09b00 DPL=0 CS64 [-RA]
> >   SS =0010 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS   [-WA]
> >   DS =0010 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS   [-WA]
> >   FS =0010 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS   [-WA]
> >   GS =0010 0000000000454d60 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS   [-WA]
> >   LDT=0000 0000000000000000 0000ffff 00008200 DPL=0 LDT
> >   TR =0080 000000000041148a 0000ffff 00008b00 DPL=0 TSS64-busy
> >   GDT=     000000000041100a 0000047f
> >   IDT=     0000000000000000 00000fff
> >   CR0=80010011 CR2=ffffffffffffc08a CR3=000000000045e000 CR4=00000020
> >   DR0=0000000000000000 DR1=0000000000000000 DR2=0000000000000000 DR3=0000000000000000
> >   DR6=00000000ffff0ff0 DR7=0000000000000400
> >   EFER=0000000000000500
> >   Code=?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? <??> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
> 

-- 
Eduardo