[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171129152040.ed5b28c198093de8968aac9b@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:20:40 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
"Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <wilal.deacon@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>,
Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 0/5] hash addresses printed with %p
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:05:00 +1100 "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc> wrote:
> Currently there exist approximately 14 000 places in the Kernel where
> addresses are being printed using an unadorned %p. This potentially
> leaks sensitive information regarding the Kernel layout in memory. Many
> of these calls are stale, instead of fixing every call lets hash the
> address by default before printing. This will of course break some
> users, forcing code printing needed addresses to be updated. We can add
> a printk specifier for this purpose (%px) to give developers a clear
> upgrade path for breakages caused by applying this patch set.
>
> The added advantage of hashing %p is that security is now opt-out, if
> you _really_ want the address you have to work a little harder and use
> %px.
>
> The idea for creating the printk specifier %px to print the actual
> address was suggested by Kees Cook (see below for email threads by
> subject).
Maybe I'm being thick, but... if we're rendering these addresses
unusable by hashing them, why not just print something like
"<obscured>" in their place? That loses the uniqueness thing but I
wonder how valuable that is in practice?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists