lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:23:27 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/96] 4.4.103-stable review

On 29 November 2017 at 13:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:56:45PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 28 November 2017 at 15:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.103 release.
>> > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > let me know.
>> >
>> > Responses should be made by Thu Nov 30 10:04:41 UTC 2017.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> >
>> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> >         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.103-rc1.gz
>> > or in the git tree and branch at:
>> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
>> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>>
>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
>> Also as per usual the HiKey results are reported separate because the
>> platform support isn’t in tree.
>
> Reported separate where?

Hikey report is in the bottom of the email (you get to see different summary)

- Naresh

>
> greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists