linux-kernel - Re: [Lkft-triage] [PATCH 4.9 000/138] 4.9.66-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:07:02 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Lkft-triage] [PATCH 4.9 000/138] 4.9.66-stable review

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:07:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:07:01PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:

> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

> Thanks for testing.

> What is up with the odd email subject prefix?

There's another internal list for looking at LKFT been set up and
they've set it up as a mailman list adding subject prefixes :(

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)