lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:41:01 +0200
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
        Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@...disk.com>,
        Mateusz Nowak <mateusz.nowak@...el.com>,
        Yuliy Izrailov <Yuliy.Izrailov@...disk.com>,
        Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
        Das Asutosh <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...il.com>,
        Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
        Harjani Ritesh <riteshh@...eaurora.org>,
        Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [PATCH V15 04/22] mmc: block: Add error-handling comments

Add error-handling comments to explain what would also be done for blk-mq
if it used the legacy error-handling.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
index e44f6d90aeb4..7dcd5d5b203b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
@@ -1911,7 +1911,11 @@ static void mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *new_req)
 		case MMC_BLK_SUCCESS:
 		case MMC_BLK_PARTIAL:
 			/*
-			 * A block was successfully transferred.
+			 * Reset success, and accept bytes_xfered. For
+			 * MMC_BLK_PARTIAL re-submit the remaining request. For
+			 * MMC_BLK_SUCCESS error out the remaining request (it
+			 * could not be re-submitted anyway if a next request
+			 * had already begun).
 			 */
 			mmc_blk_reset_success(md, type);
 
@@ -1931,6 +1935,14 @@ static void mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *new_req)
 			}
 			break;
 		case MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR:
+			/*
+			 * For SD cards, get bytes written, but do not accept
+			 * bytes_xfered if that fails. For MMC cards accept
+			 * bytes_xfered. Then try to reset. If reset fails then
+			 * error out the remaining request, otherwise retry
+			 * once (N.B mmc_blk_reset() will not succeed twice in a
+			 * row).
+			 */
 			req_pending = mmc_blk_rw_cmd_err(md, card, brq, old_req, req_pending);
 			if (mmc_blk_reset(md, card->host, type)) {
 				if (req_pending)
@@ -1947,11 +1959,20 @@ static void mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *new_req)
 			}
 			break;
 		case MMC_BLK_RETRY:
+			/*
+			 * Do not accept bytes_xfered, but retry up to 5 times,
+			 * otherwise same as abort.
+			 */
 			retune_retry_done = brq->retune_retry_done;
 			if (retry++ < 5)
 				break;
 			/* Fall through */
 		case MMC_BLK_ABORT:
+			/*
+			 * Do not accept bytes_xfered, but try to reset. If
+			 * reset succeeds, try once more, otherwise error out
+			 * the request.
+			 */
 			if (!mmc_blk_reset(md, card->host, type))
 				break;
 			mmc_blk_rw_cmd_abort(mq, card, old_req, mq_rq);
@@ -1960,6 +1981,13 @@ static void mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *new_req)
 		case MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR: {
 			int err;
 
+			/*
+			 * Do not accept bytes_xfered, but try to reset. If
+			 * reset succeeds, try once more. If reset fails with
+			 * ENODEV which means the partition is wrong, then error
+			 * out the request. Otherwise attempt to read one sector
+			 * at a time.
+			 */
 			err = mmc_blk_reset(md, card->host, type);
 			if (!err)
 				break;
@@ -1971,6 +1999,10 @@ static void mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *new_req)
 			/* Fall through */
 		}
 		case MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR:
+			/*
+			 * Do not accept bytes_xfered. If reading more than one
+			 * sector, try reading one sector at a time.
+			 */
 			if (brq->data.blocks > 1) {
 				/* Redo read one sector at a time */
 				pr_warn("%s: retrying using single block read\n",
@@ -1992,10 +2024,12 @@ static void mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *new_req)
 			}
 			break;
 		case MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM:
+			/* Do not accept bytes_xfered. Error out the request */
 			mmc_blk_rw_cmd_abort(mq, card, old_req, mq_rq);
 			mmc_blk_rw_try_restart(mq, new_req, mqrq_cur);
 			return;
 		default:
+			/* Do not accept bytes_xfered. Error out the request */
 			pr_err("%s: Unhandled return value (%d)",
 					old_req->rq_disk->disk_name, status);
 			mmc_blk_rw_cmd_abort(mq, card, old_req, mq_rq);
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ