lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:55:22 +0800
From:   Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
To:     virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mst@...hat.com,
        mhocko@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mawilcox@...rosoft.com
Cc:     david@...hat.com, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
        cornelia.huck@...ibm.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
        aarcange@...hat.com, amit.shah@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        willy@...radead.org, wei.w.wang@...el.com,
        liliang.opensource@...il.com, yang.zhang.wz@...il.com,
        quan.xu@...yun.com, nilal@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH v18 06/10] virtio_ring: add a new API, virtqueue_add_one_desc

Current virtqueue_add API implementation is based on the scatterlist
struct, which uses kaddr. This is inadequate to all the use case of
vring. For example:
- Some usages don't use IOMMU, in this case the user can directly pass
  in a physical address in hand, instead of going through the sg
  implementation (e.g. the VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SG feature)
- Sometimes, a guest physical page may not have a kaddr (e.g. high
  memory) but need to use vring (e.g. the VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ
  feature)

The new API virtqueue_add_one_desc enables the caller to assign a vring
desc with a physical address and len. Also, factor out the common code
with virtqueue_add in vring_set_avail.

Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 include/linux/virtio.h       |  6 +++
 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index eb30f3e..0b87123 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -257,6 +257,79 @@ static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect(struct virtqueue *_vq,
 	return desc;
 }
 
+static void vring_set_avail(struct virtqueue *_vq,
+			    unsigned int i)
+{
+	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
+	unsigned int avail;
+
+	avail = vq->avail_idx_shadow & (vq->vring.num - 1);
+	vq->vring.avail->ring[avail] = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, i);
+
+	/*
+	 * Descriptors and available array need to be set before we expose the
+	 * new available array entries.
+	 */
+	virtio_wmb(vq->weak_barriers);
+	vq->avail_idx_shadow++;
+	vq->vring.avail->idx = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
+					       vq->avail_idx_shadow);
+	vq->num_added++;
+
+	pr_debug("Added buffer head %i to %p\n", i, vq);
+
+	/*
+	 * This is very unlikely, but theoretically possible.  Kick
+	 * just in case.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(vq->num_added == (1 << 16) - 1))
+		virtqueue_kick(_vq);
+}
+
+int virtqueue_add_one_desc(struct virtqueue *_vq,
+			   uint64_t addr,
+			   uint32_t len,
+			   bool in_desc,
+			   void *data)
+{
+	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
+	struct vring_desc *desc;
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	START_USE(vq);
+	BUG_ON(data == NULL);
+
+	if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
+		END_USE(vq);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	if (_vq->num_free < 1) {
+		END_USE(vq);
+		return -ENOSPC;
+	}
+
+	i = vq->free_head;
+	desc = &vq->vring.desc[i];
+	desc->addr = cpu_to_virtio64(_vq->vdev, addr);
+	desc->len = cpu_to_virtio32(_vq->vdev, len);
+	if (in_desc)
+		desc->flags = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, VRING_DESC_F_WRITE);
+	else
+		desc->flags = 0;
+	vq->desc_state[i].data = data;
+	vq->desc_state[i].indir_desc = NULL;
+	vq->free_head = virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, vq->vring.desc[i].next);
+	_vq->num_free--;
+
+	vring_set_avail(_vq, i);
+
+	END_USE(vq);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_add_one_desc);
+
 static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
 				struct scatterlist *sgs[],
 				unsigned int total_sg,
@@ -269,7 +342,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
 	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
 	struct scatterlist *sg;
 	struct vring_desc *desc;
-	unsigned int i, n, avail, descs_used, uninitialized_var(prev), err_idx;
+	unsigned int i, n, descs_used, uninitialized_var(prev), err_idx;
 	int head;
 	bool indirect;
 
@@ -395,26 +468,9 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
 	else
 		vq->desc_state[head].indir_desc = ctx;
 
-	/* Put entry in available array (but don't update avail->idx until they
-	 * do sync). */
-	avail = vq->avail_idx_shadow & (vq->vring.num - 1);
-	vq->vring.avail->ring[avail] = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, head);
-
-	/* Descriptors and available array need to be set before we expose the
-	 * new available array entries. */
-	virtio_wmb(vq->weak_barriers);
-	vq->avail_idx_shadow++;
-	vq->vring.avail->idx = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev, vq->avail_idx_shadow);
-	vq->num_added++;
-
-	pr_debug("Added buffer head %i to %p\n", head, vq);
+	vring_set_avail(_vq, head);
 	END_USE(vq);
 
-	/* This is very unlikely, but theoretically possible.  Kick
-	 * just in case. */
-	if (unlikely(vq->num_added == (1 << 16) - 1))
-		virtqueue_kick(_vq);
-
 	return 0;
 
 unmap_release:
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
index 988c735..1d89996 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ struct virtqueue {
 	void *priv;
 };
 
+int virtqueue_add_one_desc(struct virtqueue *_vq,
+			   uint64_t addr,
+			   uint32_t len,
+			   bool in_desc,
+			   void *data);
+
 int virtqueue_add_outbuf(struct virtqueue *vq,
 			 struct scatterlist sg[], unsigned int num,
 			 void *data,
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists