[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D6A6B532-57B5-4393-A322-DD441BEE74C4@amacapital.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 06:33:37 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Fix native_load_gs_index() SWAPGS handling with IRQ state tracing enabled
> On Nov 29, 2017, at 4:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:09:51AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> index f81d50d7ceac..c0b52df8ee4f 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> @@ -945,16 +945,16 @@ idtentry simd_coprocessor_error do_simd_coprocessor_error has_error_code=0
>> */
>> ENTRY(native_load_gs_index)
>> FRAME_BEGIN
>> + SWAPGS /* switch from user GS to kernel GS */
>> pushfq
>> DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_ANY & ~CLBR_RDI)
>> TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>> - SWAPGS
>
> I'm thinking those moves it too far back; we should at least have
> interrupts disabled when we do SWAPGS, no? Also, curse paravirt.
>
I'll look in a few hours.
But we definitely can't have irqs on when running with user gs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists