linux-kernel - Re: UFS utilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1511972421.3222.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:20:21 -0800
From:   James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:     "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "vinholikatti@...il.com" <vinholikatti@...il.com>
Subject: Re: UFS utilities

On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 15:39 +0000, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Thread-Topic: UFS utilities
>  Thread-Index: AdNpKDYJWTPjczfxQHC/pD9WNnnl4w==

Could you fix your mail transfer agent?  It's using these non standard
headers instead of the RFC mandated In-Reply-To: and References:

The problem is that this breaks threading on the public mailing lists
and means most of us can't tie this email back to the original thread.

> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:25:47AM +0000, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi, all
> > > Is there someone knows if exists one utilis dedicated to UFS
> > > device, rather than SCSI utils?
> > > 
> > > I have tried sg3-utils, but it is not convenient for the embedded
> > > ARM-based system.
> > > 
> > > And also it doesn't support several UFS special command.
> > 
> > What specific UFS commands do you need to make to the device that
> > the current driver does not support?
> 
> 
> There are some UFS/vendor native commands. They are not SCSI based.

Can you list them?  The reason for asking is that SCSI-3 is pretty
extensive in terms of management utilities, so any function you do with
vendor native commands that matches an sg3utils function could be done
by the latter instead via a SCSI translation layer.

James