[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5A1E261A.30302@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:14:34 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To: Lihao Liang <lianglihao@...wei.com>, <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree
Hi Lihao,
On 2017/11/29 10:48, Lihao Liang wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Signed-off-by: Lihao Liang <lihao.liang@...il.com>
...
>
> Many thanks,
> Lihao.
>
> On 2017/11/29 9:14, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:51:51AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> Commit
>>>
>>> d7e182c9c324 ("rcu: Remove unnecessary spinlock in rcu_boot_init_percpu_data()")
>>>
>>> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
>> Good catch, Stephen!
>>
>> Lihao, would you please get me you Signed-off-by? The patch is below.
>>
>> Thanx, Paul
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> commit d7e182c9c32480c1f579dd888ac50e88bfb39596
>> Author: Liang Lihao <lianglihao@...wei.com>
So it's better to keep the author and Signed-off-by the same :)
Thanks
Hanjun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists