[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1512075231.2774.17.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:53:52 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "bmarzins@...hat.com" <bmarzins@...hat.com>,
"mcgrof@...nel.org" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
CC: "boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"ONeukum@...e.com" <ONeukum@...e.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nborisov@...e.com" <nborisov@...e.com>,
"oleg.b.antonyan@...il.com" <oleg.b.antonyan@...il.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"darrick.wong@...cle.com" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"ming.lei@...hat.com" <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
"oleksandr@...alenko.name" <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
"yu.chen.surf@...il.com" <yu.chen.surf@...il.com>,
"todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com" <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jikos@...nel.org" <jikos@...nel.org>,
"len.brown@...el.com" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>, "jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] fs: use freeze_fs on suspend/hibernate
On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 20:42 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 05:01:13PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > The md resync
> > thread must be stopped before a system is frozen. Today the md driver uses
> > the kthread freezing mechanism for that purpose. Do you have a plan for
> > handling the more complicated scenarios, e.g. a filesystem that exists on top
> > of an md device where the md device uses one or more files as backing store
> > and with the loop driver between the md device and the files?
>
> Nope not yet. It seems you have given this some thought though so you're
> help here is greatly appreciated. In fact the way we should see the long
> term 'kill kthread freezing' effort should be a collaborative one. I've
> never touched md, so folks more familiar with md should give this some
> thought.
>
> Can for instance md register_pm_notifier() and register_syscore_ops()
> and do handy work to pause some work to replace kthread freezing?
> Note that I believe a pm notifier is needed in case syscore_suspend()
> is not called, say on a suspend fail.
Sorry but I don't think that a solution can be based on a notifier mechanism.
Freezing has to happen in the order in which drivers and filesystems have
been stacked (filesystem > md device > filesystem for the above example).
Since the order in which notifiers are called is related to the order in
which notifiers have been registered I don't think that a solution for the
example I described can be based on notifiers. What I think we need is a
mechanism for traversing the storage stack that includes block drivers and
an equivalent of freeze_fs() for block drivers. Freezing should occur by
calling the freeze_fs() methods for each storage layer starting at the top of
the storage stack and proceeding towards the bottom.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists