[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171130215157.GB2808@amd>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:51:57 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, bart.vanassche@....com,
ming.lei@...hat.com, tytso@....edu, darrick.wong@...cle.com,
jikos@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, len.brown@...el.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
jgross@...e.com, todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com, nborisov@...e.com,
jack@...e.cz, martin.petersen@...cle.com, ONeukum@...e.com,
oleksandr@...alenko.name, oleg.b.antonyan@...il.com,
yu.chen.surf@...il.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] fs: use freeze_fs on suspend/hibernate
Hi!
> Proposed solution:
>
> Instead of fixing such semantics and trying to get all filesystems to do it
> right, we can easily do away with all freezing calls if the filesystem
> implements a proper freeze_fs() callback. The following 9 filesystems have
> freeze_fs() implemented as such we can let the kernel issue the callback upon
> suspend and thaw on resume automatically on our behalf.
>
> o xfs
> o reiserfs
> o nilfs2
> o jfs
> o f2fs
> o ext4
> o ext2
> o btrfs
>
> Of these, the following have freezer helpers, which can then be removed
> after the kernel automaticaly calls freeze_fs for us on suspend:
>
> o xfs
> o nilfs2
> o jfs
> o f2fs
> o ext4
>
> I've tested this on a system with ext4 and XFS, and have let 0-day go at
> without issues. I have branches availabe for linux-next [3] and Linus'
> latest tree [4].
Was hibernation tested? uswsusp?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists