[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171130080752.f805cbf32704649bf8735385@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:07:52 +0100
From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, arndbergmann@...il.com,
Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board -
ts72xx derivative
Hello Lukasz,
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:07:04 +0100
Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de> wrote:
> > > +/*************************************************************************
> > > + * BK3 support code
> > > +
> > > *************************************************************************/
> > > +static struct mtd_partition bk3_nand_parts[] = {
> > > + {
> > > + .name = "System",
> > > + .offset = 0x00000000,
> >
> > I see the above and below lines as unaligned
>
> This is strange.... I'm using emacs with extension to have coding style
> for kernel.
>
> Probably tabs get unaligned...
Yes, seems that they are.
[...]
> >
> > > + .atag_offset = 0x100,
> > > + .map_io = bk3_map_io,
> >
> > again, inconsistent alignment...
>
> Even more..... checkpatch.pl did not complained....
checkpatch.pl wouldn't complain, as there are basically two styles,
some people do not align the individual assignments in the structures at all.
But I was quite confident in the beginning and now even applied your v3 to
the code. And indeed it's unaligned... I even checked with emacs. Still
unaligned.
--
Alexander Sverdlin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists