lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:18:28 +0100
From:   Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Arun Kumar Neelakantam <aneela@...eaurora.org>,
        Chris Lew <clew@...eaurora.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] soc: qcom: Introduce QMI helpers

Bjorn,

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qmi_interface.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qmi_interface.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4027b52b0834
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qmi_interface.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,857 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Linaro Ltd.
> + *
> + * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and
> + * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */

Could it make sense, especially for new files, to use the new SPDX ids
and avoid adding boilerplate that will need to be cleaned up later?
e.g. something like this instead, using the new conventions started by
greg-kh and by documented tglx?

NB: the // comment  style is not a mistake and is what Linus wants
there. See the threads on this topic.

> @@ -0,0 +1,857 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Linaro Ltd.
> + */

Isn't this shorter and better? :P

BTW, if you need help to fix this on the rest of Linaro contributed
code, I maintain a tool that can help there.

-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne, the licensing janitor bot

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ