[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171130121447.5118-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:14:47 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: make function update_share_count static
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The function update_share_count is local to the source and does
not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warning:
fs/btrfs/backref.c:219:6: warning: symbol 'update_share_count' was not
declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index 7d0dc100a09a..e4054e533f6d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ static int prelim_ref_compare(struct prelim_ref *ref1,
return 0;
}
-void update_share_count(struct share_check *sc, int oldcount, int newcount)
+static void update_share_count(struct share_check *sc, int oldcount,
+ int newcount)
{
if ((!sc) || (oldcount == 0 && newcount < 1))
return;
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists