[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171130140053.28973-1-courbet@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:00:53 +0100
From: Clement Courbet <courbet@...gle.com>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5] lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
> So I think it really worth to be separated patch. Really, it's
> completely nontrivial why adding new function in lib/find_bit.c
> requires including asm-generic/bitops/find.h in arm and uncore32
> asm/bitops.h headers (bug?). And why doing that makes you guard
> find_first_bit and find_first_zero_bit (another bug?).
OK, I'll send a separate patch for this.
> Linux-next is your choice.
> [...]
> Again. test_find_next_and_bit is trimmed, but it is still based on
> get_cycles and uses tabs in printf(). Please fix it.
OK, I'll send a version of the patch rebased against linux-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists