[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171130142037.19339-3-hch@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 06:20:37 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
eter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] epoll: use proper wake_up variant in ep_poll_callback
We do not hold ep->wq->lock, so we should not use wake_up_locked on it.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index afd548ebc328..eaaa39616232 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, v
break;
}
}
- wake_up_locked(&ep->wq);
+ wake_up(&ep->wq);
}
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->poll_wait))
pwake++;
--
2.14.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists