[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed7d5ef0-ef9f-3f3e-0ae5-9714ab83bf16@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:08:49 +0100
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Linux NVMe Mailinglist <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-fc: don't require user to enter host_traddr
On 11/30/2017 03:56 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> One major usability difference between NVMf RDMA and FC is resolving
> the default host transport address in RDMA. This is perfectly doable
> in FC as well, as we already have all possible lport <-> rport
> combinations pre-populated so we can pick the first lport that has a
> connection to our desired rport per default or optionally use the user
> supplied lport if we have one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
> Cc: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/fc.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
> index 7ab0be55c7d0..46ab900bbe26 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
> @@ -3328,15 +3328,19 @@ nvme_fc_create_ctrl(struct device *dev, struct nvmf_ctrl_options *opts)
> if (ret || !raddr.nn || !raddr.pn)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> - ret = nvme_fc_parse_traddr(&laddr, opts->host_traddr, NVMF_TRADDR_SIZE);
> - if (ret || !laddr.nn || !laddr.pn)
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + if (opts->mask & NVMF_OPT_HOST_TRADDR) {
> + ret = nvme_fc_parse_traddr(&laddr, opts->host_traddr,
> + NVMF_TRADDR_SIZE);
> + if (ret || !laddr.nn || !laddr.pn)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
>
> /* find the host and remote ports to connect together */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&nvme_fc_lock, flags);
> list_for_each_entry(lport, &nvme_fc_lport_list, port_list) {
> - if (lport->localport.node_name != laddr.nn ||
> - lport->localport.port_name != laddr.pn)
> + if ((laddr.nn || laddr.pn) &&
> + (lport->localport.node_name != laddr.nn ||
> + lport->localport.port_name != laddr.pn))
> continue;
>
> list_for_each_entry(rport, &lport->endp_list, endp_list) {
We need both, 'laddr.nn' and 'laddr.pn'. So this statement is wrong.
You probably need something like
if (!laddr.nn || !laddr.pn || ....)
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists