[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171130161220.GK9903@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:12:20 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads
On 30/11/17 16:02, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 30-Nov 14:41, Juri Lelli wrote:
[...]
> > If the DL changes (which I shall post again as soon as tip/sched/core is
> > bumped up to 4.15-rc1) get in first, this is going to be useless (as the
> > DL kthread gets ignored by the scheduling class itself). But, this looks
> > good to me "in the meantime".
>
> Just to better understand, you mean that the DL kthread does not send
> out schedutil updates?
It doesn't have a "proper" bandwidth (utilization) :/. So it gets
"unnoticed" and schedutil updates are not triggered.
>
> If that's the case I agree we can discard this patch... that's also
> one of the reasons why I move it at the end of this series.
Not sure about this though, not my call :). I guess this still helps
until we get the DL changes in.
Best,
Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists