linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 3/6] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Rewrite ts72xx_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:07:55 +0000
From:   Hartley Sweeten <HartleyS@...ionengravers.com>
To:     Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>,
        Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "arndbergmann@...il.com" <arndbergmann@...il.com>
CC:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/6] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Rewrite
 ts72xx_register_flash() to accept parameters

On Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:45 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> This commit extend the ts72xx_register_flash() to accept passed parameters, which makes it more reusable.
>
> Now it is possible to accept ep93xx flash start address and partitions.

<snip>

@@ -223,7 +217,9 @@ static struct platform_device ts73xx_fpga_device = {  static void __init ts72xx_init_machine(void)  {

Lukasz,

The line above is corrupted in the patch and will not apply. Not sure what happened...

>  	ep93xx_init_devices();
> -	ts72xx_register_flash();
> +	ts72xx_register_flash(ts72xx_nand_parts, ARRAY_SIZE(ts72xx_nand_parts),
> +			      is_ts9420_installed() ?
> +			      EP93XX_CS7_PHYS_BASE : EP93XX_CS6_PHYS_BASE);
>  	platform_device_register(&ts72xx_rtc_device);
>  	platform_device_register(&ts72xx_wdt_device);

Regards,
Hartley