linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] vhost: fix skb leak in handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <09e75683-4c49-7446-e13e-93b316ed270c@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2017 15:11:05 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     wexu@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mst@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] vhost: fix skb leak in handle_rx()



On 2017年12月01日 13:54, wexu@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Wei Xu <wexu@...hat.com>
>
> Matthew found a roughly 40% tcp throughput regression with commit
> c67df11f(vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array) as discussed
> in the following thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg187936.html
>
> Eventually we figured out that it was a skb leak in handle_rx()
> when sending packets to the VM. This usually happens when a guest
> can not drain out vq as fast as vhost fills in, afterwards it sets
> off the traffic jam and leaks skb(s) which occurs as no headcount
> to send on the vq from vhost side.
>
> This can be avoided by making sure we have got enough headcount
> before actually consuming a skb from the batched rx array while
> transmitting, which is simply done by moving checking the zero
> headcount a bit ahead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <wexu@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>   drivers/vhost/net.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index 8d626d7..c7bdeb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -778,16 +778,6 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
>   		/* On error, stop handling until the next kick. */
>   		if (unlikely(headcount < 0))
>   			goto out;
> -		if (nvq->rx_array)
> -			msg.msg_control = vhost_net_buf_consume(&nvq->rxq);
> -		/* On overrun, truncate and discard */
> -		if (unlikely(headcount > UIO_MAXIOV)) {
> -			iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, READ, vq->iov, 1, 1);
> -			err = sock->ops->recvmsg(sock, &msg,
> -						 1, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_TRUNC);
> -			pr_debug("Discarded rx packet: len %zd\n", sock_len);
> -			continue;
> -		}
>   		/* OK, now we need to know about added descriptors. */
>   		if (!headcount) {
>   			if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
> @@ -800,6 +790,16 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
>   			 * they refilled. */
>   			goto out;
>   		}
> +		if (nvq->rx_array)
> +			msg.msg_control = vhost_net_buf_consume(&nvq->rxq);
> +		/* On overrun, truncate and discard */
> +		if (unlikely(headcount > UIO_MAXIOV)) {
> +			iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, READ, vq->iov, 1, 1);
> +			err = sock->ops->recvmsg(sock, &msg,
> +						 1, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_TRUNC);
> +			pr_debug("Discarded rx packet: len %zd\n", sock_len);
> +			continue;
> +		}
>   		/* We don't need to be notified again. */
>   		iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, READ, vq->iov, in, vhost_len);
>   		fixup = msg.msg_iter;

I suggest to reorder this patch to 3/3.

Thanks