[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171201080049.GB4218@cbox>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:00:49 +0100
From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
To: Vasyl Gomonovych <gomonovych@...il.com>
Cc: christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
eric.auger@...hat.com, andre.przywara@....com,
wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO()
Hi Vasyl,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:48:17PM +0100, Vasyl Gomonovych wrote:
> Fix ptr_ret.cocci warnings:
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c:971:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
>
> Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci
For new code, sure it would make sense to use this.
But why is it worth changing existing code to use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO?
Thanks,
-Christoffer
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasyl Gomonovych <gomonovych@...il.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 1f761a9991e7..28d85754320b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -1032,10 +1032,8 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_mapd(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
>
> device = vgic_its_alloc_device(its, device_id, itt_addr,
> num_eventid_bits);
> - if (IS_ERR(device))
> - return PTR_ERR(device);
>
> - return 0;
> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(device);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists