lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171201091930.5ddygjl23owfovrz@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2017 10:19:30 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@...cle.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check pfn_valid first in zero_resv_unavail

On Fri 01-12-17 16:56:57, Dave Young wrote:
> On 11/30/17 at 10:35am, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > Can we exclude that range from the memblock allocator instead? E.g. what
> > happens if somebody allocates from that range?
> 
> It is a EFI BGRT image buffer provided by firmware, they are reserved
> always and can not be used to allocate memory.

Hmm, I see but I was actually suggesting to remove this range from the
memblock allocator altogether (memblock_remove) as it shouldn't be there
in the first place.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ