[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171201094958.GL22431@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:49:58 +0200
From: "mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Bernat, Yehezkel" <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>
Cc: "andreas.noever@...il.com" <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jamet, Michael" <michael.jamet@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thunderbolt: Mask ring interrupt properly when
polling starts
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:21:34PM +0000, Bernat, Yehezkel wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 14:48 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > When ring enters polling mode we are expected to mask the ring
> > interrupt
> > before the callback is called. However, the current code actually
> > unmasks it probably because of a copy-paste mistake.
> >
> > Mask the interrupt properly from now on.
> >
> > Fixes: 4ffe722eefcb ("thunderbolt: Add polling mode for rings")
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
> > index 419a7a90bce0..f45bcbc63738 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
> > @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static void __ring_interrupt(struct tb_ring
> > *ring)
> > return;
> >
> > if (ring->start_poll) {
> > - __ring_interrupt_mask(ring, false);
> > + __ring_interrupt_mask(ring, true);
> > ring->start_poll(ring->poll_data);
> > } else {
> > schedule_work(&ring->work);
>
> Acked-by: Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>
Applied with Yehezkel's ACK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists