[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb622b26-acb0-3203-51fe-62bfa1b5cc5b@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:57:21 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/entry/64/paravirt: Use paravirt-safe macro to
access eflags
On 12/01/2017 11:22 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
> <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com> wrote:
>> Commit 1d3e53e8624a ("x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make
>> them NMI-safe") added DEBUG_ENTRY_ASSERT_IRQS_OFF macro that acceses
>> eflags using 'pushfq' instruction when testing for IF bit. On PV Xen
>> guests looking at IF flag directly will always see it set, resulting
>> in 'ud2'.
>>
>> Introduce SAVE_FLAGS() macro that will use appropriate save_fl pv op
>> when running paravirt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> V2:
>> * Preserve %rax in DEBUG_ENTRY_ASSERT_IRQS_OFF
>> * Return (pop) %rax in SAVE_FLAGS for !CONFIG_PARAVIRT (irqflags.h)
>>
>> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 7 ++++---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 9 +++++++++
>> arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets_64.c | 3 +++
>> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> index f81d50d..c208dc1 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> @@ -466,12 +466,13 @@ END(irq_entries_start)
>>
>> .macro DEBUG_ENTRY_ASSERT_IRQS_OFF
>> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY
>> - pushfq
>> - testl $X86_EFLAGS_IF, (%rsp)
>> + pushq %rax
>> + SAVE_FLAGS(CLBR_ANY)
>> + testl $X86_EFLAGS_IF, %eax
> Confused. You're both using CLBR_ANY and RAX. Did you perhaps mean CLBR_NONE?
CLBR_NONE will restore all registers, won't it? So it should be
CLBR_RAX, should it? Otherwise we'll lose return value.
-boris
>
>> jz .Lokay_\@
>> ud2
>> .Lokay_\@:
>> - addq $8, %rsp
>> + popq %rax
>> #endif
>> .endm
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists