[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171201192152.GD142348@google.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:21:52 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, lkp@...org,
ltp@...ts.linux.it
Subject: Re: 3239b6f29b ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if buffer
is too small"): ltp.keyctl06.fail
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:40:12AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> We noticed LTP keyctl06 test regression in
>
> commit: 3239b6f29bdfb4b0a2ba59df995fc9e6f4df7f1f ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if buffer is too small")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> on test machine: 48 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz with 64G memory
> with following parameters:
>
> disk: 1HDD
> fs: ext4
> test: syscalls_part2
>
> test-description: The LTP testsuite contains a collection of tools for testing the Linux kernel and related features.
> test-url: http://linux-test-project.github.io/
>
> To reproduce:
>
> git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
> cd lkp-tests
> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
> bin/lkp run job.yaml
>
> testcase/path_params/tbox_group/run: ltp/1HDD-ext4-syscalls_part2/ivb44
>
Did this include LTP commit f21703fe45d3 ("syscalls/keyctl06: update to test for
follow-on fix")? It would be really helpful if these reports would include the
LTP commit that was used.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists