linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/21] checkpatch: Add warnings for {smp_,}read_barrier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171201214416.GJ7829@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:44:16 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/21] checkpatch: Add warnings for
 {smp_,}read_barrier_depends()

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 12:14:17PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 11:51 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Now that both smp_read_barrier_depends() and read_barrier_depends()
> > are being de-emphasized, warn if any are added.
> 
> This would also warn on existing files when run
> with ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f <file>
> 
> Do you want it to check new patches only?
> 
> If so the test could become "if (!$file && etc...)
> 
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > index 95cda3ecc66b..25f7098e2ad3 100755
> > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > @@ -5586,6 +5586,12 @@ sub process {
> >  			}
> >  		}
> >  
> > +# check for smp_read_barrier_depends and read_barrier_depends
> > +		if ($line =~ /\b(smp_|)read_barrier_depends\(/) {
> 
> Must become
> 
> +		if ($line =~ /\b(smp_|)read_barrier_depends\s*\(/) {
> 
> similar to the lines above this as there are sometimes
> spaces between function name and argument parentheses.

Good points!  Like this?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit ff155ce179aab891dbe2ca80f82a453383fd165a
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon Nov 27 09:37:35 2017 -0800

    checkpatch: Add warnings for {smp_,}read_barrier_depends()
    
    Now that both smp_read_barrier_depends() and read_barrier_depends()
    are being de-emphasized, warn if any are added.
    
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
    Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
    Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
    [ paulmck: Skipped checking files and handled whitespace per Joe Perches. ]

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 95cda3ecc66b..0d90518d4147 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -5586,6 +5586,12 @@ sub process {
 			}
 		}
 
+# check for smp_read_barrier_depends and read_barrier_depends
+		if (!$file && $line =~ /\b(smp_|)read_barrier_depends\s*\(/) {
+			WARN("READ_BARRIER_DEPENDS",
+			     "Dependency barriers should only be used in READ_ONCE or DEC Alpha code" . $herecurr);
+		}
+
 # check of hardware specific defines
 		if ($line =~ m@^.\s*\#\s*if.*\b(__i386__|__powerpc64__|__sun__|__s390x__)\b@ && $realfile !~ m@...lude/asm-@) {
 			CHK("ARCH_DEFINES",