[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171202134534.3252-2-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 21:45:32 +0800
From: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roger Jargoyhen <rjargoyhen@...il.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: Use __func__ instead of write_ec_cmd in pr_err
To deal with checkpatch warning:
WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'write_ec_cmd',
this function's name, in a string
Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
index 9f2a4bc58df0..37a88938bbaa 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int write_ec_cmd(acpi_handle handle, int cmd, unsigned long data)
if (val == 0)
return 0;
}
- pr_err("timeout in write_ec_cmd\n");
+ pr_err("timeout in %s\n", __func__);
return -1;
}
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists