linux-kernel - Re: [v2,2/3] hwmon: (aspeed-pwm-tacho) Deassert reset in probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171203185834.GA6772@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sun, 3 Dec 2017 10:58:34 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Joel <joel@....id.au>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
        Mykola Kostenok <c_mykolak@...lanox.com>,
        Jaghathiswari Rankappagounder Natarajan <jaghu@...gle.com>,
        Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2,2/3] hwmon: (aspeed-pwm-tacho) Deassert reset in probe

On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:53:48PM +1100, Joel wrote:
> The ASPEED SoC must deassert a reset in order to use the PWM/tach
> peripheral.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>

I have not heard from anyone objecting to this change, so I am going to
accept it. See below for a list of changes required to get there.

> ---
> v2:
>  - Correct horrible mistakes
>  - Boot tested and hwmon sysfs files checked
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/aspeed-pwm-tacho.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/aspeed-pwm-tacho.c b/drivers/hwmon/aspeed-pwm-tacho.c
> index 63a95e23ca81..77bb7a4bbed4 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/aspeed-pwm-tacho.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/aspeed-pwm-tacho.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
>  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/thermal.h>
>  
> @@ -181,6 +182,7 @@ struct aspeed_cooling_device {
>  
>  struct aspeed_pwm_tacho_data {
>  	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	struct reset_control *rst;
>  	unsigned long clk_freq;
>  	bool pwm_present[8];
>  	bool fan_tach_present[16];
> @@ -931,6 +933,15 @@ static int aspeed_pwm_tacho_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			&aspeed_pwm_tacho_regmap_config);
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap))
>  		return PTR_ERR(priv->regmap);
> +
> +	priv->rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->rst)) {
> +		dev_err(dev,
> +			"missing or invalid reset controller device tree entry");
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->rst);
> +	}
> +	reset_control_deassert(priv->rst);
> +
>  	regmap_write(priv->regmap, ASPEED_PTCR_TACH_SOURCE, 0);
>  	regmap_write(priv->regmap, ASPEED_PTCR_TACH_SOURCE_EXT, 0);
>  
> @@ -960,6 +971,15 @@ static int aspeed_pwm_tacho_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(hwmon);
>  }
>  
> +static int aspeed_pwm_tacho_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct aspeed_pwm_tacho_data *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	reset_control_assert(priv->rst);

This asserts reset before the hwmon device is removed. Please use
devm_add_action_or_reset() after reset_control_deassert() to avoid
this problem.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id of_pwm_tacho_match_table[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-pwm-tacho", },
>  	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-pwm-tacho", },
> @@ -969,6 +989,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwm_tacho_match_table);
>  
>  static struct platform_driver aspeed_pwm_tacho_driver = {
>  	.probe		= aspeed_pwm_tacho_probe,
> +	.remove 	= aspeed_pwm_tacho_remove,

... and by doing that you won't need the remove function, and you don't
have to fix the checkpatch error here.

>  	.driver		= {
>  		.name	= "aspeed_pwm_tacho",
>  		.of_match_table = of_pwm_tacho_match_table,