[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171204212215.f5dqiei6eqk6d7de@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:22:15 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ivo Sieben <meltedpianoman@...il.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] eeprom: at25: Add DT support for 25lc040
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some "atmel,at25" compatible SPI EEPROMs (e.g. Microchip 25lc040) use an
> odd number of address bits. This patch series adds support for
> instantiating such devices from DT.
>
> Do EEPROMs using 17 or 25 address bits, as mentioned in
> include/linux/spi/eeprom.h, really exist?
> Or should we just limit it to a single odd value (9 bits)?
>
> This has been tested with a bunch of 25lc040 EEPROMs.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Geert Uytterhoeven (3):
> eeprom: at25: Add DT support for EEPROMs with odd address bits
> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Grammar s/are can/can/
> dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Document device-specific compatible values
2 and 3 are fixes and I'll apply for 4.15 if you don't mind.
Rob
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at25.txt | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists