linux-kernel - Re: [patch 47/60] x86/ldt: Map LDT entries into fixmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrWQ+nFKP3m8xQOnn53832kpBaqD7yNn256CfwNgx=J=PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:33:06 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirsky <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>, aliguori@...zon.com,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>
Subject: Re: [patch 47/60] x86/ldt: Map LDT entries into fixmap

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> LDT is not really commonly used on 64bit so the overhead of populating the
> fixmap entries on context switch for the rare LDT syscall users is a
> reasonable trade off vs. having extra dynamically managed mapping space per
> process.
>

Hmm, I wonder just how slow this is.  It might be okay.  It's
certainly not the way I imagined it working.

--Andy