[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1512430537.6321.58.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:35:37 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Bruno E. O. Meneguele" <brdeoliv@...hat.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ima: log message to module appraisal error
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 18:23 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote:
> Simple but useful message log to the user in case of module appraise is
> forced and fails due to the lack of file descriptor, that might be
> caused by kmod calls to compressed modules.
[]
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
[]
> @@ -366,8 +366,12 @@ int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id read_id)
>
> if (!file && read_id == READING_MODULE) {
> if (!sig_enforce && (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES) &&
> - (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
> + (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE)) {
> + pr_err("impossible to appraise a module without a file \
> + descriptor. sig_enforce kernel parameter might \
> + help\n");
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You should probably use scripts/checkpatch.pl on your proposed
patches
before sending them.
You've got a lot of tabs and spaces after every line continuation.
Please coalesce the format on a single line and avoid this defect.
pr_err("impossible to appraise a module without a file descriptor. sig_enforce kernel parameter might help\n");
cheers, Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists