[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b654b4f3-6b75-c7ae-8d20-f60835c5c1b0@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:10:28 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mst@...hat.com, caihe@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio_net: fix return value check in
receive_mergeable()
On 2017年12月04日 14:02, wangyunjian wrote:
> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
>
> The function virtqueue_get_buf_ctx() could return NULL, the return
> value 'buf' need to be checked with NULL, not value 'ctx'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 19a985e..559b215 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
> int num_skb_frags;
>
> buf = virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(rq->vq, &len, &ctx);
> - if (unlikely(!ctx)) {
> + if (unlikely(!buf)) {
> pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers out of %d missing\n",
> dev->name, num_buf,
> virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev,
Hi:
The path looks good but I'm not sure this is a real fix since we add
data and ctx simultaneously in virtqueue_add_inbuf_ctx().
Any bad result you see without this patch?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists